curl and SSPI

Published: 2020-02-17
Last Updated: 2020-02-17 18:09:24 UTC
by Didier Stevens (Version: 1)
3 comment(s)

There's an interesting comment on Xavier's diary entry "Keep an Eye on Command-Line Browsers" (paraphrasing): a proxy with authentication will prevent wget and curl to access the Internet because they don't do integrated authentication.

It just happens that since a couple of months, I use curl on Windows with SSPI to authenticate to a proxy. I use the following command:

curl --proxy proxyname:proxyport --proxy-ntlm -U : https://isc.sans.edu

First, you need a version of curl with SSPI support:

Windows 10's version of curl does support SSPI.

With this, I can connect to my proxy (--proxy) and authenticate (--proxy-ntlm) without having the provide credentials to authenticate to the proxy (-U :). curl will use an SSPI to perform integrated authentication to the proxy. This is explained on curl's man page:

If you use a Windows SSPI-enabled curl binary and do either Negotiate or NTLM authentication then you can tell curl to select the user name and password from your environment by specifying a single colon with this option: "-U :".

curl's SSPI feature can also be used to authenticate to an internal IIS server.

By default, curl will not authenticate to a proxy, but it can be directed to do so via options.

I didn't find a version of wget that supports SSPI. If you know one, or you made one, please post a comment.

 

Didier Stevens
Senior handler
Microsoft MVP
blog.DidierStevens.com DidierStevensLabs.com

Keywords: curl sspi windows
3 comment(s)
ISC Stormcast For Monday, February 17th 2020 https://isc.sans.edu/podcastdetail.html?id=6870

Comments

What's this all about ..?
password reveal .
<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is described as follows because they respect your privacy and keep your data secure:

<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is described as follows because they respect your privacy and keep your data secure. The social networks are not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go.

<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go. The social networks only collect the minimum amount of information required for the service that they provide. Your personal information is kept private, and is never shared with other companies without your permission
https://thehomestore.com.pk/
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> nearest public toilet to me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> nearest public toilet to me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
https://defineprogramming.com/
https://defineprogramming.com/
Enter comment here... a fake TeamViewer page, and that page led to a different type of malware. This week's infection involved a downloaded JavaScript (.js) file that led to Microsoft Installer packages (.msi files) containing other script that used free or open source programs.
distribute malware. Even if the URL listed on the ad shows a legitimate website, subsequent ad traffic can easily lead to a fake page. Different types of malware are distributed in this manner. I've seen IcedID (Bokbot), Gozi/ISFB, and various information stealers distributed through fake software websites that were provided through Google ad traffic. I submitted malicious files from this example to VirusTotal and found a low rate of detection, with some files not showing as malware at all. Additionally, domains associated with this infection frequently change. That might make it hard to detect.
https://clickercounter.org/
Enter corthrthmment here...

Diary Archives