Analysis of PDFs Created with OpenOffice/LibreOffice

Published: 2019-04-01
Last Updated: 2019-04-01 15:57:13 UTC
by Didier Stevens (Version: 1)
0 comment(s)

From time to time, I get a question about PDFs that have an /OpenAction, but don't seem to contain (malicious) code.

When you look at such a PDF with pdfid.py, everything looks OK, except that there is an /OpenAction:

You can also find search keywords like /OpenAction using pdf-parser.py's statistics option (-a). Best is to combine this with option -O to look inside stream objects, should they be present:

The /OpenAction is in object 12:

This /OpenAction is typically added by OpenOffice and LibreOffice when creating a PDF document. Its purpose is to present the first page when you open the document for the first time. This is called an Explicit Destination.

/OpenAction here is not used to execute JavaScript code upon opening of the PDF (as is often the case with malicious PDFs), but it is used to present the first page with the desired position and zoom. This is explained in the PDF reference documents:

This explicit destination refers to object 1: this is a page:

When you encounter a document like this, it's most likely not malicious. Should you suspect that this is targeted, then you could continue your analysis as explained in diary entry series "It is a resume", for example. A targeted attack might use a more sofisticated exploit, without any of the signs reported by pdfid or pdf-parser's statistics. But it's very unlikely to find this in common maldocs.

Here is a video for this quick analysis:

 

Didier Stevens
Senior handler
Microsoft MVP
blog.DidierStevens.com DidierStevensLabs.com

0 comment(s)

Comments

What's this all about ..?
password reveal .
<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is described as follows because they respect your privacy and keep your data secure:

<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is described as follows because they respect your privacy and keep your data secure. The social networks are not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go.

<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go. The social networks only collect the minimum amount of information required for the service that they provide. Your personal information is kept private, and is never shared with other companies without your permission
https://thehomestore.com.pk/
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> nearest public toilet to me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> nearest public toilet to me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
https://defineprogramming.com/
https://defineprogramming.com/
Enter comment here... a fake TeamViewer page, and that page led to a different type of malware. This week's infection involved a downloaded JavaScript (.js) file that led to Microsoft Installer packages (.msi files) containing other script that used free or open source programs.
distribute malware. Even if the URL listed on the ad shows a legitimate website, subsequent ad traffic can easily lead to a fake page. Different types of malware are distributed in this manner. I've seen IcedID (Bokbot), Gozi/ISFB, and various information stealers distributed through fake software websites that were provided through Google ad traffic. I submitted malicious files from this example to VirusTotal and found a low rate of detection, with some files not showing as malware at all. Additionally, domains associated with this infection frequently change. That might make it hard to detect.
https://clickercounter.org/
Enter corthrthmment here...

Diary Archives