Cisco ASA WebVPN Vulnerability

Published: 2018-01-30
Last Updated: 2018-01-31 15:35:06 UTC
by Kevin Liston (Version: 2)
8 comment(s)

Before I get too many "I'm surprised/disappointed you haven't mentioned..." emails let's get out a rough draft on CVE-2018-0101.

What is it?  A Base CVSS of 10 remote code execution and denial of service vulnerability affecting Cisco ASA devices with webvpn configured with SSL support.

What's the hurry?  Details of the exploit research will be presented this weekend at Recon in Brussels.  So it's getting some press.  Also, CISCO released the advisory yesterday so people who are into that sort of thing are writing their own tests and scanners and exploits.

How do I know if I'm affected?  I don't own one of these, so I don't have a great answer.  Do you have a CISCO ASA? (check your inventory)  Do you have webvpn configured? (check your config)  Does it support SSL or is it TLS support only? (check your config)  

I have one of these set up this way, now what do I do?  Upgrade to the 9.6 branch and patch.

I can't do that for reasons, what do I do?  Reduce the exposure by blocking un-needed networks.

Very funny, it's a vpn, I need that open to the Internet.  Do you really need it open to the ENTIRE Internet?

Yes, I'm a <industry> and <reasons>   Okay, if you can't patch, and you can't block, then you must monitor.

Alright, how do I do that?  I'm going to have to get back to you on that. Update: You may want to look at these proposed IDS signatures: https://gist.github.com/fox-srt/09401dfdfc15652b22956b9cc59f71cb

Keywords: cisco
8 comment(s)
ISC Stormcast For Wednesday, January 31st 2018 https://isc.sans.edu/podcastdetail.html?id=5849

Using FLIR in Incident Response?

Published: 2018-01-30
Last Updated: 2018-01-30 20:11:44 UTC
by Kevin Liston (Version: 1)
1 comment(s)

Take a look at a few lines...

Frist the going rate of a bitcoin:

Next the going rate of monero:

Both are seeing a lot of gains.  How is their performance related to each other?

Here are a few more lines to look at...

The Google Webtrends for the search term "ransomware":

Now the trends for the term "bitcoin":

And the trend for the term "monero":

The peak interest in "ransomware" searches is in May 2017 back when Wanacry was making a lot of noise.  NotPetya hit in June/July of 2017 and that seems to have been ransomware stopped losing its appeal for criminals.  Because NotPetya was a wiper and not actual ransomware, confidence that you would get your files back if you paid the ransom eroded.  Ransomware hasn't disppaered, but it has dropped in popularity.  (There appears to be more money to be made helping people launch ransomware attacks than actually launching attacks see: https://isc.sans.edu/forums/diary/Ransomware+as+a+Service/23277/)

Perhaps criminals don't want the amount of attention that incidents like wanacry or NotPetya generated.  Maybe they feel bad about the unintended consequences of locking down a hospital's computer system?  Or maybe there's just more/easier money in finding unused/poorly-secured resources to generate cryptocurrencies.

Crypto miners seem to be the payload du jour.  While writing this down, reader Chis shared the miner that was dropped on one of their servers.  The ad hoc bash script used indicates that there's a bit of red-on-red violence in the ilicit mining scene.  It also seems to be profitable, it looks like the pool used in this instance has generated a dozen or so monero units (is that the right term?) so far.

In response to this trend I'm adding an FLIR camera to my Incident Response jump kit.

Keywords: CryptoCurrency
1 comment(s)
ISC Stormcast For Tuesday, January 30th 2018 https://isc.sans.edu/podcastdetail.html?id=5847

Comments

What's this all about ..?
password reveal .
<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is described as follows because they respect your privacy and keep your data secure:

<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is described as follows because they respect your privacy and keep your data secure. The social networks are not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go.

<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go. The social networks only collect the minimum amount of information required for the service that they provide. Your personal information is kept private, and is never shared with other companies without your permission
https://thehomestore.com.pk/
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> nearest public toilet to me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> nearest public toilet to me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
https://defineprogramming.com/
https://defineprogramming.com/
Enter comment here... a fake TeamViewer page, and that page led to a different type of malware. This week's infection involved a downloaded JavaScript (.js) file that led to Microsoft Installer packages (.msi files) containing other script that used free or open source programs.
distribute malware. Even if the URL listed on the ad shows a legitimate website, subsequent ad traffic can easily lead to a fake page. Different types of malware are distributed in this manner. I've seen IcedID (Bokbot), Gozi/ISFB, and various information stealers distributed through fake software websites that were provided through Google ad traffic. I submitted malicious files from this example to VirusTotal and found a low rate of detection, with some files not showing as malware at all. Additionally, domains associated with this infection frequently change. That might make it hard to detect.
https://clickercounter.org/
Enter corthrthmment here...

Diary Archives