Snipping Leaks

Published: 2012-11-30
Last Updated: 2012-11-30 17:44:56 UTC
by Daniel Wesemann (Version: 1)
0 comment(s)


ISC reader Phil asked a great question earlier today: "I'm wondering if there are data leakage concerns with screenshot tools such as MS Snipping Tool, if such tools have metadata in any of the formats they support".

Well, yes, they do.

Screenshots taken with the MS Snipping Tool and saved in JPG format contain both an EXIF and XMP header. You can look at what's in there for example with Phil Harvey's excellent ExifTool (http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/)

The leakage is nowhere near as extensive as what is often found in MS Office documents, but it is definitely present. Among lots of information that describe the geometry of the screenshot taken, the more interesting fields include the name of the user who created the "snip", as well as the time stamp. The name is the full user name as configured for the respective windows account. If you want to surreptitiously post an image somewhere under a pseudonym, that's definitely a point to keep in mind ;).

EXIF and XMP tags can be readily removed - again using ExifTool, a simple "exiftool -ALL= image.jpg" will remove all meta tags from the image. Exiftool is friendly enough to create a backup named image.jpg_original, in the rare case something goes wrong in the process.

If you use other screen capture tools and have information on the meta data that gets stored together with the capture, please comment below or via our contact form.
 

 

Keywords: exif Leak metadata xmp
0 comment(s)
ISC StormCast for Friday, November 30th 2012 http://isc.sans.edu/podcastdetail.html?id=2974
Nmap 6.25 released - lots of new goodies, see http://nmap.org/changelog.html

Comments

What's this all about ..?
password reveal .
<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is described as follows because they respect your privacy and keep your data secure:

<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is described as follows because they respect your privacy and keep your data secure. The social networks are not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go.

<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go. The social networks only collect the minimum amount of information required for the service that they provide. Your personal information is kept private, and is never shared with other companies without your permission
https://thehomestore.com.pk/
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> nearest public toilet to me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> nearest public toilet to me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
https://defineprogramming.com/
https://defineprogramming.com/
Enter comment here... a fake TeamViewer page, and that page led to a different type of malware. This week's infection involved a downloaded JavaScript (.js) file that led to Microsoft Installer packages (.msi files) containing other script that used free or open source programs.
distribute malware. Even if the URL listed on the ad shows a legitimate website, subsequent ad traffic can easily lead to a fake page. Different types of malware are distributed in this manner. I've seen IcedID (Bokbot), Gozi/ISFB, and various information stealers distributed through fake software websites that were provided through Google ad traffic. I submitted malicious files from this example to VirusTotal and found a low rate of detection, with some files not showing as malware at all. Additionally, domains associated with this infection frequently change. That might make it hard to detect.
https://clickercounter.org/
Enter corthrthmment here...

Diary Archives