More on ColdFusion hacks

Published: 2009-07-05
Last Updated: 2009-07-05 22:00:59 UTC
by Bojan Zdrnja (Version: 1)
1 comment(s)

Thanks to our readers Adam and Oobi we received some additional information regarding recent ColdFusion hacks.
As I wrote in the previous diary (http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=6715), the attackers are exploiting vulnerable FCKEditor installations, which come enabled by default with ColdFusion 8.0.1 as well as some other ColdFusion packages.

The first thing the attackers do is uploading a ColdFusion web shell – a script very similar to ASP.NET or PHP web shells we've been writing so much about. The web shell I analyzed is very powerful and seems to be recent – according to the date in the script it was released on the 23rd of June by a Chinese hacker "Seraph".

The script has a simple authentication mechanism – it verifies what the URL parameter "action" is set to, as can be seen in the screenshot below:

seraph action variable test

If the parameter "action" is set to "seraph", the user can access the web site, otherwise the script just prints back "seraph". In other words, the URL the attacker accesses after uploading the script will look something like this: http://www.hacked.site/uploaded_file.cfm?action=seraph

A nice thing (for us doing forensics, at least) is that you can now grep through your logs for "action=seraph" to see if you have been hacked with the same script. Keep in mind that this is not a definite test, of course, since the action variable's name can be easily modified.

--
Bojan

1 comment(s)

Comments

What's this all about ..?
password reveal .
<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is described as follows because they respect your privacy and keep your data secure:

<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is described as follows because they respect your privacy and keep your data secure. The social networks are not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go.

<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go. The social networks only collect the minimum amount of information required for the service that they provide. Your personal information is kept private, and is never shared with other companies without your permission
https://thehomestore.com.pk/
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> nearest public toilet to me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> nearest public toilet to me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
https://defineprogramming.com/
https://defineprogramming.com/
Enter comment here... a fake TeamViewer page, and that page led to a different type of malware. This week's infection involved a downloaded JavaScript (.js) file that led to Microsoft Installer packages (.msi files) containing other script that used free or open source programs.
distribute malware. Even if the URL listed on the ad shows a legitimate website, subsequent ad traffic can easily lead to a fake page. Different types of malware are distributed in this manner. I've seen IcedID (Bokbot), Gozi/ISFB, and various information stealers distributed through fake software websites that were provided through Google ad traffic. I submitted malicious files from this example to VirusTotal and found a low rate of detection, with some files not showing as malware at all. Additionally, domains associated with this infection frequently change. That might make it hard to detect.
https://clickercounter.org/
Enter corthrthmment here...

Diary Archives